Tuesday, September 4, 2007

Narrative and Multiple State Environments

Donna Leishman creates narrative digital art by layering images in Flash, and creating an interface without obvious visual or auditory cues as to the location or meaning of the hotspots and layers. She explains:

"Firstly, instead of being complexly non-linear (in the cybertextual sense), the project is a layered structure, which uses branching offshoots [23]. This structural layering works in "building up" compositions that can be regarded as a MSE. The different layers show the interrelationships between the narrative objects. This linking works in an unconventional manner -- layering as a storytelling technique is little used within digital media; it requires participants to make associations between objects using a spatial rather than time based metaphor, such as typically practiced by Owenns or Thomson & Craighead [15]. This sense of difference is compounded further when the depiction of the world and its inhabitants is a mix of the believable, impossible, familiar and bizarre (My aesthetic ). The total effect is that the work communicates to the participant in an unfamiliar, disturbing but imaginative manner."


Her dissertation project asked viewers to explore one of her works, Deviant, and to discuss their experiences. She describes the goal of the project as an effort to subvert emerging narrative conventions for hypertext and hypermedia. One question that she raises -- whether pointing and clicking destroys the storytelling experience -- bothers me as well. That's one reason that I'm really interested to see whether we can create the kind of intuitive narrative experience that we're striving for.

Leishman's work is further explored in this collection from the Iowa Review Web.


AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Labels: ,

1 Comments:

At October 7, 2007 1:38 PM , Blogger elphaba said...

this is the kind of stuff that makes me keep my mouth in a crowd for fear of exposing my colossal ignorance among the other people who seem to be getting it. They are nodding and saying things like very non-linear or hypermedia interspersed with the emerging narrative work to subvert the dominant paradigm. What????
Is this journalism? If so, what story is it telling and who is the audience?
How are we serving our reader/viewer with this. Entertainment? Make them think? About what?
I thought it was fun to click around, as enjoyable as mah jong online, but no matter what order I clicked I had no idea what the story was. And if I'm supposed to determine the story, that's all well and good and this exercise has no more or nor less intrinsic value than does mah jong, or watching Brittny on TheFAn.
If the lesson is that the click and point does destroy the storytelling experience, maybe the question is for whom: the teller or listener?
I wonder about reading a story, even poynter does this a lot, with active links in the story. How long does it take for one to get to the end of the story if one clicks every link? Does one ever get, in more ways than one, the whole story?
I sometimes come away such an experience feeling scattered, disoriented - What was I reading? What did I learn?
But all discourse is good and has its place.
I don't see this as journalism but it is, after all, a free virtual world.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home